Kick-Ass (2010)

By -- Published on Apr 21st, 2010 and filed under Action/Adventure, Comedy, Film Reviews, Indie. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Hallelujah!  Nicolas Cage has finally returned.  Once a brilliant and respected actor whose eccentricities and prodigious talents combined to create truly memorable characters like H.I. McDunnough in the Coen Brothers’ zany masterpiece, “Raising Arizona,” and Charlie Kaufman’s neurotic, alter-ego twins in Spike Jonze’s “Adaptation,” Cage has since become known more for laughably bad turns in schlocky cash-grabs like “Ghost Rider” and the “National Treasure” films; presumably to pay for his nasty habit of buying things he can’t afford, like castles and islands.

In Matthew Vaughn’s ambitious comic-book adaptation, “Kick-Ass,” Cage plays an ex-cop-turned deranged masked vigilante called Big Daddy, bent on exacting revenge on crime boss Frank D’Amico for killing his wife and framing him for drug possession.  Cage’s performance is a gem of inane wackiness, punctuated by a baffling voice change that sounds like a poorly executed Adam West impression as soon as he dons his Batman look-a-like hero suit.

I was encouraged by Cage’s fantastic performance in Werner Herzog’s hilariously weird “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans” last year, but “Kick-Ass” solidifies his return from the purgatory of generic, uninteresting acting.  Unfortunately, Nicolas Cage isn’t the star of this story leaving the vibrancy he lends the film fleeting.  The rest of this nerd wish-fulfillment fantasy falls well short of its ambitions.

The story follows a comic book nerd named Dave Lizewski (Aaron Johnson).  Girls don’t like him, he’s not especially talented or funny and he’s more-or-less a non-factor when it comes to the hierarchy of high school popularity.  During a discussion with his foul-mouthed buddies he wonders why, with the prevalence of superheroes in popular culture, no one has ever undertaken the task of masked-vigilante-ism in real life.  (Never mind the fact that New York alone is home to dozens of costumed crime-fighters and do-gooders prowling the streets in real life).  As a product of his own fantasy and as a reaction to repeatedly being mugged, Dave decides to take justice into his own hands and becomes the masked crusader, Kick-Ass.  And thanks to a terribly botched attempt at serving justice he winds up with damaged nerve endings and a body full of metal plates that allow him to fight (badly) for extended periods of time without the hindrance of pain.

The premise of a true-to-life superhero, bound by the laws of physics, is a familiar one.  Christopher Nolan’s “Batman Begins” being a prime example attempting to approach the comic world as practically as possible.  But what promise “Kick-Ass” begins with, grounded in some version of reality, it quickly abandons and becomes an exercise in absurdity.  Why go to such great lengths to establish your story in reality, even taking great pains to devise a feasible biological excuse for Kick-Ass’ ability to fight without getting hurt, and then introduce Hit-Girl (Chloe Moretz), an 11-year-old who can run on walls and annihilate an army of grizzled, heavily armed criminals in mere minutes?  Hit-Girl’s existence renders the entire first half of the movie pointless, and the film on the whole utterly devoid of internal consistency.

Some will probably argue that the film isn’t meant to be taken seriously and is therefore not subject to the same scrutiny as a typical drama set in reality.  But the flaw in this argument is exposed by the film itself, which elaborately establishes the rules of its own universe.  Why hasn’t anybody in real life become a superhero?  “Because they’d get killed,” according to one of Dave’s buddies.  Furthermore, Dave’s first encounter with the muggers as Kick-Ass ends exactly how it probably should have — with our would-be hero lying in a bloody, unconscious heap on the pavement.

Is this nitpicking?  Irrelevant to the broader goals of the film?  Hardly.  Internal consistency is absolutely crucial to sound storytelling.  It doesn’t matter whether the film is set in Lewis Carroll’s Wonderland where virtually anything is possible or in Martin Scorsese’s New York where only the grittiest realism resides, a film must conform to the laws of its own reality.  “Kick-Ass” feels like the work of two entirely different directors with wildly different ideas and tonal styles.

Does this mean the film isn’t enjoyable?  Not entirely.  Jane Goldman and Matthew Vaughn do a fine job of retaining the spirit of the comic in places and “Kick-Ass” is genuinely funny in short bursts and will probably be at least mildly entertaining for the casual fan. But Aaron Johnson’s terribly didactic and unrelenting narration stifles the natural flow of the story. It’s baffling inconsistency, under-use of Nicolas Cage and troubling tendency to indulge in fanboy pandering destroy any hopes “Kick-Ass” had of becoming a satire of the superhero film and render it just another mediocre entry into the already saturated genre.

  • matt86h2o

    I agree with your article for the most part but I disagree with your statements about the movie not living within its own confines of reality. When it comes to hit girl they do a superb job establishing her character. In the first scene where thir characters are introduced, Damon Macreedy (Nicholas Cage) puts three bullets into a Kevlar vest Mindy Macreedy (Chloe Martz) is wearing to teach her not to feel fear (not to mention foreshadows an even bigger scene later in the film). Later you see the comic he made for his daughter to explain why they were going after Frank D’Amico’s (Mark Strong) organization, as well as quizzing her on things from weapon specs to Jon Woo movie trivia, as she practices with her butterfly knives she received for her 11th birthday. When talking to his old partner Marcus he explains how he has made the murder and looting into a game for his young daughter. This shows many of the ways her father has been grooming her into this little masked “hit girl” you grow to love on the screen. Is it plausible that a flying kick from an 11 year old girl is going to send a grown man through a door? Probably not. However, is it safe to say a young child who is trained properly from the age of 5 could use many assorted weapons such as knives and guns? Even perform acrobatics you claim to be impossible by an 11 year old such as running on wall? If you watch that scene again you will see that she is really running on the bookshelves in the hallway of D’Amicos penthouse loft. I don't know about you but if you've ever watched the Olympic gymnasts there are some pretty amazing feats done by very little girls.
    The movie tries to keep its reality close to that of real life but it still is farfetched that’s what makes it so great. In the world we live in people aren’t born knowing the value of life and how killing is wrong, it is taught to them by their parents hopefully. What if your dad was border line psychotic, hell bent on revenge and trained you from age 5 to 11 to be a killing machine? Who’s to say that the onscreen character we see is that off base. When Hit girl wipes out 20 or so men while using night vision, the camera shows the scene from first person perspective almost as a video game such as Call of Duty or Rainbow six; something that many kids of that age love to play. While Hit girl could wipe out Razzul and his gangbangers, or D’Amicos untrained hired muscle, she was no match when she faced off with D’Amico at the end (who trained extensively in martial arts). I watched this movie twice already and have to say it just keeps getting better. If you really want to question the movies reality,; how is it that when Dave Lizewski (Aaron Johnson) is in Katie Deauxmas (Lyndsay Fonesca) room rubbing her with lotion while both are wearing nothing but underwear, he has zero scars from all the surgery and plates put in his body? You look right past that because it is too hard to focus on anything but the beautiful half naked girl he is rubbing lotion on.
    In your review you state that “internal consistency is absolutely crucial to sound storytelling.” I totally agree with this statement but just don’t see how you argue this convincingly in your critique of the movie. In the end I think many may have a hard time with her character not because of the lack of character development or because the movie isn't living in its own reality, but rather the fact that NO grown man wants to see himself getting whooped by an eleven year old girl!! I feel that you should give the movie another watch and possibly give hit girl another chance. Matthew Vaughn has been involved with some great movies but I think front to back this is one of his best. This is definitely not a superhero movie for kids. It’s a one of a kind, dark and twisted drama/comedy that delivers so much more than a 30sec preview could ever prepare you for.

  • http://themovingarts.com Eric

    I appreciate your comments. I can definitely see the appeal of the film, but I think I made a pretty strong case.

  • cali00

    Kick-Ass is in theaters now!! Order tickets online at http://www.kickass-themovie.com and don't forget to post your own review on http://www.facebook.com/kickass!

  • Tina

    The film tells the story from the teenager's (Kick-Ass's) point-of-view, but he is not the heart of the story. The heart of the story is Hit-Girl. As courageous as he becomes, Kick-Ass is really a wannabe hero without even the ambition to improve his fighting skills or attain a weapon. He's living within his own personal limits. Hit-Girl and Big Daddy are the real heroes. They are obsessed with both developing the physical finesse and with attaining the tools and weapons necessary to achieve the feats we see. Dave's friend claims that normal people don't become heroes because they'd get killed. Although Big Daddy survives quite a long time by relocating frequently, building safe houses, and only attacking with the element of surprise on his side, he does indeed die. I argue that his character does exist in the realm of reality created by the movie. Hit-Girl doesn't just know how to walk on walls–she's trained in combat, apparently gymnastics, and hand weaponry. Yes, Dave's buddy is right that normal people don't become heroes because would get killed. But the narrative clearly shows that Mindy and her dad are not normal. Normal people aren't obsessed with training to crumble a drug empire. Normal people fear death. The duo is beyond caring.

    I agree that the movie displays an unusual structure. It seems odd that the real hero–Hit Girl–is not the protagonist. Rather, the comic relief, Dave “Kiss Ass” is the protagonist and narrator. I found the unusual structure entertaining and refreshing, but not all would agree :) .

  • http://themovingarts.com Eric

    I don't have any issues with Hit-Girl or Kick-Ass individually. But they don't belong in the same movie. Vaughn undercuts the entire premise of his film by having those two characters exist in the same universe.

  • ForAnAngel

    I have an idea… what if everything that happens in the movie after Kick-Ass gets hit by the car is really only a dream that Dave is having while he is unconscious at the hospital? That would explain why the movie goes more and more over the top as it gets closer to the end. Not to mention the fact that Dave even says, the 1st time he's in Katie's bedroom, “My life had become like a f***ed up nightmare I couldn't wake up from.” Think about it!

  • http://themovingarts.com Eric

    You may be on to something.

  • matt86h2o

    Im still having a hard time understanding why you say that the two should not be in the same movie. One character hit-girl is a trained to do everything that she does such as robbing killing and kicking ass. She's been trained not to feel fear which is why her dad used her as a human target to teach her not to be scared when someone pulled a gun on her. The other character is a wanna be who's training involves jumping over spare tires and alleys and running around on rooftops. The thing is kick ass and big daddy arent even superheros. They arent' looking for people to help. Their costumes were a way for a deperate father to convince his daughter that it is ok to rob and kill.
    what really blows my mind is that you are never comment on how unreal it would be for this kid to get beat up, stabbed, ran over. All this metal inserted in his body and never has to go through rehab. Modern medicine is great but come on really. Kick -ass's modern marvel of medicine which gives him the ability to fight crime is no more far fetched that a girl taken at 5 years old and trained for 6 years to be a bad ass crime fighter. I guess I'm just having a hard time with your argument about these two characters not existing in the same movie. And I'm not trying to be rude but I did a pretty good job refuting your first argument and responding to your critics saying “I made a pretty strong case” isn't gonna make your arument any more valid. If you want me to keep coming back to read your reviews I would hope that you could elaborate more on your opinions when they are challenged.

  • http://themovingarts.com Eric

    I appreciate your comments. But the reason I didn't counter every single one of your points in my response is because my article already explicitly refutes your comments. Feel free to re-read the article. It's all there. But, I'll elaborate a bit anyway.

    When you say: “Kick -ass's modern marvel of medicine which gives him the ability to fight crime is no more far fetched that a girl taken at 5 years old and trained for 6 years to be a bad ass crime fighter.” Really? I guess it's you and I who live in different realities. There are thousands of documented cases of people with damaged nervous systems (from birth or incurred later in life) who cannot feel pain. There's even a disorder called congenital analgia some babies are born with that renders them unable to feel pain. Furthermore, the practice of replacing organs and the body's structural elements with metal or other fabricated materials is extremely common in modern medicine. Could both of those things happen to the same person and to the same extent as Kick-Ass? Unlikely, but certainly within the realm of possibility. (Although Kick-Ass must have had some great insurance).

    But an 11-year-old girl with the ability to infiltrate and methodically execute dozens of heavily armed professional mobsters? No. Even if she was a 21-year-old Olympic gymnast, a Green Beret and could bench 350 lbs she still wouldn't be able to do what Hit-Girl does. No way.

    Vaughn clearly establishes the premise of what would actually happen if someone tried to be a superhero in real life. (You can't possibly argue that that isn't one of the key themes of the film). But then why even address that point in the first place if you're just going to abandon the whole idea by introducing Hit-Girl? Hit-Girl and Kick-Ass live in two entirely different movies. The film's inconsistency here is glaring.

    I can understand if certain fans are willing to look past this gaping flaw and choose to enjoy the film anyway, that's fine, but to suggest that there is no flaw at all in the film's logic concerning this point is ridiculous.

    Again, thanks for the comments and I hope you keep reading :)

  • Pingback: Private Servers

Latest Reviews

Log in / Allinoneplace.com
Flixster Certified Bloggers Follow Us On Twitter Subscribe RSSFacebook