Predators (2010)

By -- Published on Jul 16th, 2010 and filed under Action/Adventure, Film Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry


Rumor has it that three follow up films, a sequel and two crossovers with the “Alien” franchise, to John McTiernan’s 1987 sci-fi thriller, “Predator,” exist somewhere out there in the ether.  I’m convinced this is nothing more than a legend, an old wives’ tale.  I don’t believe it.  There is only one sequel to that testosterone-filled, suspense-riddled Arnold Schwarzenegger classic and it is Nimrod Antal’s “Predators.”

Royce (Adrien Brody), an ex-US special forces soldier-turned mercenary regains consciousness while hurtling toward a thick blanket of trees below.  He has no idea where he is or why.  Moments after his parachute springs open he crashes into a dense tropical forest.  Gathering himself he discovers a half dozen others that have arrived just as he has. Among them: a Russian Spetsnaz commando (Oleg Taktarov), a Sierra Leonean death squad soldier (Mahershalalhashbaz Ali), a convicted Federal prisoner (Walton Goggins), a Yakuza assassin (Louis Ozawa Changchien), a Mexican drug cartel enforcer (Danny Trejo) and an Israeli black ops sniper (Alice Braga).

And then there is the scrawny weaponless clean-cut medical doctor (Topher Grace) who feels curiously out of place among the human predators and various agents of death.  But as you might guess, he’s not exactly as he seems.

This violent group of bewildered earthlings apprehensively chooses to stick together and sets off in search of a way off of what they soon learn is an alien planet designated as a game preserve for a technologically advanced race of giant warrior aliens.  Apparently they pluck the most dangerous and skilled killers from various planets and use them as game to improve their own hunting skills.

“Predators” wisely ignores the events of “Predator 2″ (1990), “Alien vs. Predator” (2004) and “Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem” (2007), all of which I’m still convinced don’t exist, and plays as a direct sequel to McTiernan’s original. Schwarzenegger and his showdown with the alien predator in that film is even mentioned by Braga’s character as the group tries to make sense of the precarious situation they’ve found themselves in.  And the narrative follows roughly the same format to mostly great effect.

But there are some key differences that give the edge to the original.  The decisive factor, other than the holy trinity of Schwarzenegger, Carl Weathers and Jesse Ventura, that makes McTiernan’s film so good is an element that so many modern action films lack — silence.  ”Predator” mastered the atmospheric, supreme intensity of stillness, the calm before the storm.  ”Predators” is by no means mindless, non-stop action, but it does seem a little eager to rush through plot points and necessary lulls so it can get on to the next set piece.

The cast, contrary to popular anticipation, is quite good.  Although his melodramatic, all-knowing, Hemingway-quoting persona gets tiresome, Brody puts his Oscar-winning chops to unexpectedly good use as the grim, humorless leader. Walton Goggins is magnetic and funny per usual and Topher Grace’s sarcastic comedy fits into the deadly alien jungle surprisingly well.  A plump, deranged Laurence Fishburne is the only real weak link.

It’s not perfect, but in a world of remakes and mind-melding idiocy, “Predators” manages to come away a competent, worthy entry into the series.

  • Predator

    What language is this publicity written in? Never mind the moronic strong opinions, like those Predator 2 movies don't exist, (you also forgot to mention Predator 3, I've seen it) I was seriously struggling while reading – please give this article to an English-speaking person who can get it in shape , sort of..??

  • http://themovingarts.com Eric

    huh?

  • gaga

    Good review, imho.

    The post obove shows the intellect level of the poster.

  • jasus

    THREE follow up films AND a sequel? What are the three follow up films if they aren't the AVP movies?

  • http://themovingarts.com Eric

    Please, re-read the first paragraph. It is correct. What comes after the comma is a clarifying statement, not items in a list.

  • Rob

    Wow, coming into this late, this is what I get for waiting to watch movies. I am curious as to why you dismiss Predator 2? I remember being very young when I watched both of the Predator films so I don’t trust my opinion of these films when I first watched them, but having watched the two recently (I saw the AVP movie and decided to skip Requiem, AVP was awful) I would say that the second film is just about superior to the first. Not by much, but just slightly.

    The first movie is a great action movie, I agree with you about the silence, it has a tiny cast that fills the movie and this is partly due to the atmosphere being a palpable cast member. The silence, the mood, are the alien; the alien is what is making the first half of the film weird and deadly. The cast is small enough and stereotypical enough to push through an easy plot and an easy story that you end up caring about. It ends as a confrontation even though it starts as a slasher film. It really is more in line with Jason than with Die Hard.

    But the second film really hits home with the basic premise of the first two films. Which is the idea that a predator, an animal that hunts and kills you, does so without you knowing. As Danny Glover and his minions attempt to keep order there is something out there that doesn’t care about order or who or what you are, it just wants to kill you. Just like a hunter killing wolves doesn’t care about the complicated lives and social structures of the wolves, he just wants the wolf pelt. That’s what makes these movies great, the viewer starts off caring about what is going on with the characters minus the alien, but then the alien slowly, through mood and murder, takes over the narration and movement of the characters. The hunted don’t know they are hunted they are living their normal lives, it’s not until they realize they are that the movie changes speeds.

    I think that’s what makes the newest Predator movie that much of a disappointment. It wants to keep the human element, the surprise element. But there is no surprise at this point. We know there are aliens out there, we know they are hunters, the small changes around the corners, making the film on the predator planet (maybe) and having the predators and their different types and factions take over as the other half of the plot is just window dressing. It really does not give anything new or fresh to the mythology of the series.

    I think for this film series to have anything left in it the next film just shouldn’t have humans in it. If you really want to show the struggle the aliens are having with each other get rid of the pretext of the hunt and just concentrate on the aliens. This is an impossibility though because unless it goes completely CGI the creatures just aren’t believable in those suits. It became very obvious during Predator’s sword fight scene that these creatures surely do not and can not move fast enough in the trees or on foot to be the same creatures that threatened Arnold and Danny Glover. The first two film makers seemed to understand the limitations of the man in the suit and decided to go with mood and shadow to convey the otherworldly strength and speed of the Predators. The new film seemed to think it could get away with this incongruity with CGI dogs.

    Rambling. Anywho, I don’t agree that this movie is anywhere near as good as either of the first two Predator films, although it is certainly better than AVP.

  • Pingback: Private Servers

Latest Reviews

Log in / Allinoneplace.com
Flixster Certified Bloggers Follow Us On Twitter Subscribe RSSFacebook